Chat place blog – free online internet blogging

There are currently 2 responses to “Do ever wonder if sopa will demand any video sharing website should start costing money?”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

1. 1 On June 1st, 2013, Ed Fox said:

   No. YouTube are legally obliged to comply with the copyright owner’s instructions and that is considered adequate.
   Teens have a tendency to misuse any site at all they get their hands on.
   YouTube was started as a site for ordinary people to upload and share home videos – with their own images and their own sound – no copyright issues whatsoever. It was the bizarre teen obsession with uploading copyright content that led the three guys who started YouTube to simply give up, walk away from the site and offer it for sale.
   In terms of SOPA, imagine you are a recording artist and you issue a track for people to buy because music is your profession and you are in it to earn money. How would you feel if a horde of random teens are stealing your track from the Internet instead of buying it.
   The only reason SOPA is even needed is because arrogant teens simply will not stop their theft of content from the Internet.

   posted on June 1st, 2013 at 1:37 am

2. 2 On June 1st, 2013, raina_vissora said:

   First of all… SOPA isn’t an organization. It’s a failed bill. It doesn’t want anything. It also had absolutely nothing to do with video sites charging fees.

   Second… It’s a failed bill. It never even made it to a vote, and has no legal authority to begin with.

   If you want to worry about something, worry about the CISPA/CSA/SECURE IT bills that are currently under consideration in Congress, rather than the one that was defeated months ago.

   posted on June 1st, 2013 at 1:50 am

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.